NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Denton v R [2020] NSWCCA 341 Hearing dates: 3 June 2020 Date of orders: 18 December 2020 Decision date: 18 December 2020 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Bellew J at [78] Wilson J at [79] Decision: 1. The time in which to appeal is extended to 2 December 2020. 2. Leave is granted to appeal against the conviction of 9 July 2018 for the offence of committing an act of indecency. 3. Appeal allowed, conviction set aside. 4. A verdict of acquittal is entered. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeal — Appeal against conviction — point not raised below – where expert evidence admitted in first trial was ruled inadmissible in second trial – where ruling of trial judge in second trial was upheld in Court of Criminal Appeal – where following second trial the applicant sought leave to appeal against conviction in first trial – where no objection was taken to evidence at first trial – leave granted under r 4 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) as admission of the evidence led to a miscarriage of justice CRIME — Appeal — Appeal against conviction — miscarriage of justice — where Crown relied on the complainant's drawing depicting an "abnormal skin flap" on applicant's penis – where Crown adduced expert evidence from a general practitioner that there was no "major abnormality" in the applicant's penis but it was "moderately unusual" – where general practitioner did not have specialised knowledge of anatomy or urology based on relevant training, study or experience – where jury invited to make comparison of drawing and photograph based on expert evidence of abnormality – held, admission of evidence led to miscarriage of justice – appeal allowed, conviction set aside – verdict of acquittal entered Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61N(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 9 Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(b), s 5F(3A) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 76, 79. Cases Cited: Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 122; [2014] HCA 29 R v Denton [2019] NSWCCA 81 R v Thomas Denton, District Court (NSW), 3 April 2019, unrep Velevski v The Queen [2002] HCA 4; (2002) 76 ALJR 402 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas Denton (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Smith SC/A Cook (Applicant) M Kumar (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate