NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mitchell v Wood [2020] NSWCATAP 269 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 December 2020 Decision date: 16 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: G Curtin SC, Senior Member P Molony, Senior Member Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — hearing — ex parte — procedural fairness — appellant aware of hearing date but attended medical appointment instead – Tribunal complied with statutory duties – no procedural unfairness Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Sch 4, cl 12(1) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), r 35 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), s 175 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Souleles v Todd [2016] NSWCA 91 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54; [1986] 161 CLR 141 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Blake Neville Mitchell (Appellant) Katrina Wood (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self-Represented) Respondent (Self-Represented) File Number(s): AP 20/34587 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 10 August 2020 Before: S Fenwick, General Member File Number(s): RT 20/13864
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate