NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Glynn v R [2020] NSWCCA 347 Hearing dates: 18 November 2020 Date of orders: 17 December 2020 Decision date: 17 December 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL; Price J; Fagan J Decision: (1) Appeal upheld. (2) The appellant's conviction and sentence are quashed. (3) List the case for mention at the District Court at Sydney on 22 January 2021 at 9:30am. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – jury verdict of guilty to an alternative count of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm – Crown concession of error by trial judge in refusing to admit a video into evidence – whether proviso should be applied – whether oral testimony contrary to the Crown case was obviously false – unnecessary to consider whether case was extreme – powerful prosecution case – credibility of witnesses was crucial – witness' credibility undermined by evidence of police officer – witness credibility supported by the video – appellant denied fair chance of acquittal – new trial ordered Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33(1)(b), 35(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 38, 165(2) Cases Cited: Castle v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 449; [2016] HCA 46 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29; 253 A Crim R 126 Hofer v R [2019] NSWCCA 244 Kalbasi v Western Australia (2018) 264 CLR 62; [2018] HCA 7; 271 A Crim R 245 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300; [2005] HCA 81; 158 A Crim R 133 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Glynn (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Chhabra (Appellant) M Kumar (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate