NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATOD 150 Hearing dates: 4 November 2020 Date of orders: 17 December 2020 Decision date: 17 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: S E Frost, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – security industry – applicant convicted under s 316(1) of the Crimes Act of the offence of 'conceal serious indictable offence of another person' – whether that offence is an offence involving dishonesty – mandatory refusal ground WORDS AND PHRASES – 'an offence involving fraud, dishonesty or stealing' Legislation Cited: Security Industry Act 1997 Security Industry Regulation 2016 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: Farah v Director General, Department of Finance and Services [2014] NSWCATAP 23 RTA v Sharp Towing Pty Ltd and ors (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 49 Barber v Law Society of NSW (No 2) [2001] NSWSC 361 Joyce v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 17 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary Category: Principal judgment Parties: Minh Tuan Nguyen (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-Represented) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00218922 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate