NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: L & A Fazzini Pty Ltd v Amaca Pty Ltd [2020] NSWDDT 12 Hearing dates: 27 August 2020 Date of orders: 27 November 2020 Decision date: 27 November 2020 Before: Scotting J Decision: (1) The first cross-claim is dismissed. (2) Fazzini is to pay Amaca's costs of the first cross-claim on the ordinary basis, as agreed or assessed. (3) The costs order in (2) can be enforced forthwith. (4) I will hear the parties on an alternate costs order if an application is made within 7 days by written notification to the other party and my Associate. Catchwords: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL – relief - restitution claim – contribution and/or indemnity Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2013 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 Cases Cited: Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty Ltd v Hills Industries Ltd (2014) 253 CLR 560 Broers v Australian Co-operative Foods Ltd [2008] NSWDDT 38 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Freshmark Ltd v Mercantile Mutual Insurance (Australia) Ltd [1994] 2 Qd R 390 Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1986) 162 CLR 221 Power Technologies Pty Ltd v Energy Australia [2010] NSWCA 107 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 516 Sempra Metals Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners [2008] 1 AC 561 Stewart v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2008] NSWDDT 32 Texts Cited: Keith Mason, J W Carter and G J Tolhurst, Mason and Carter's Restitution law in Australia, 2nd ed, Lexis Nexis Butterworths, Sydney, 2016. Category: Principal judgment Parties: L & A Fazzini Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Cross Claimant) Amaca Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/Cross Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D T Miller SC with M Smith ( First Defendant/Cross Claimant) J C Sheller SC (Second Defendant/Cross Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate