NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Duarte v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2020] NSWCCA 351 Hearing dates: 23 October 2020 Date of orders: 18 December 2020 Decision date: 18 December 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Harrison J at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: (1) Question 1 – The Court declines to answer. (2) Question 2 – The Court declines to answer. (3) Question 3 – The Court declines to answer. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Case stated by a Judge of the District Court of NSW – Applicant convicted of recklessly damaging property by fire – Three questions submitted for the Court's determination – Observations as to the purpose of the stated case procedure – Procedure does not confer a general right of appeal – Emphasis on the fact that the procedure is centred upon questions giving rise to consideration of matters of principle which are of general application – Lack of clarity in question posed – Attempt to challenge the ultimate determination which was made in the Court below – Appropriate case in which to invoke the discretion of the Court to decline to answer the questions asked Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 (NSW) Cases Cited: Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 205 CLR 50; [2001] HCA 25 Barca v The Queen (1975) 133 CLR 82; [1975] HCA 42 CB v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2014) 240 A Crim R 451; [2014] NSWCA 134 Lavorato v R (2012) 82 NSWLR 568; [2012] NSWCCA 61 Mack Fleet Pty Limited v Transport for NSW (2020) 93 MVR 242; [2020] NSWCA 149 Orr v Cobar Management Pty Limited (2020) 383 ALR 352; [2020] NSWCCA 220 Plomp v The Queen (1963) 110 CLR 234; [1963] HCA 44 R v Lewis; ex parte Attorney General [1991] 2 Qd R 294 R v Madden (1996) 85 A Crim R 367 R v Porter (2004) 141 A Crim R 593; [2004] NSWCCA 32 Re Van der Lubbe (1949) 66 WN (NSW) 140 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Talay v R [2010] NSWCCA 308 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 256 CLR 132; [2016] HCA 35 The Queen v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618; [2007] HCA 13 Tritton v Clarke [2018] NSWCCA 31 Weissensteiner v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 217; [1993] HCA 65 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adelino Duarte – Applicant Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) - Respondent Representation: Counsel: D Buchanan SC and S Fraser – Applicant B Baker – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate