NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Connell v R [2020] NSWCCA 352 Hearing dates: 20 November 2020 Decision date: 21 December 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Davies J at [54]; Fagan J at [55] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) The sentence imposed on the applicant by Priestley SC DCJ on 16 December 2019 is quashed. (3) In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment for 8 years, commencing 16 February 2019 and expiring 15 February 2027 with a non-parole period of 5 years and 2 months expiring 15 April 2024. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – supply large commercial quantity of MDA and possession of firearms – whether sentencing judge applied the early plea discount to the indicative sentences – ambiguity in sentencing judge's reasons amounting to error of law – appeal against sentence allowed – need to re-sentence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Berryman v R [2017] NSWCCA 297 Elsaj v R [2017] NSWCCA 124 Ibbotson (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 92 PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179 (R v Andrew John Black; R v Rowan Alastair Connell [2019] NSWDC 756). R v Cahill [2015] NSWCCA 53 Sanchet v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2006] NSWCCA 291 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rowan Alastair Connell – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: J Brock – Applicant M Kumar – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate