NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Richards [2020] NSWDC 763 Hearing dates: 15 December 2020 Date of orders: 16 December 2020 Decision date: 16 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 48 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – historical sexual offences – accused's application for permanent stay – alleged abuse of process on account of oppression to accused – delay in bringing charges – prospective fourth prosecution against accused since Royal Commission – accused fit to stand trial, but suffers impairment in short term memory – whether accused may obtain a fair trial Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 25D, 55 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 144, 165B Cases Cited: Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237 Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23 Marwan v Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWCCA 161 McIver v R [2019] NSWCCA 214 Moubarak v Holt [2019] NSWCA 102 R v Edwards (2009) 255 ALR 399 R v Presser [1958] VR 45 R v Rivkin (2004) 59 NSWLR 284 Strickland (a pseudonym) v Director of Public Prosecutions (2018) 266 CLR 325 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 Texts Cited: Second Reading Speech of the Attorney General in relation to the Limitation Amendment (Child Abuse) Bill 2016 (NSW) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions Mr D Richards Representation: Counsel: Mr D Mortes for the Director of Public Prosecutions Mr P Skinner for the accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate