NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pittmore Pty Ltd v Chan; Chan v Tan [2020] NSWCA 344 Hearing dates: 18,19 November 2020 Decision date: 18 December 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Brereton JA at [214]. Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal, direct Pittmore to file a notice of appeal in accordance with the draft notice of appeal, and otherwise dispense with the requirements of service. 2. Appeal dismissed. 3. Grant leave to cross-appeal, direct Mr Chan to file a notice of cross-appeal in accordance with the draft notice of cross-appeal, and otherwise dispense with the requirements of service. 4. Cross-appeal dismissed. 5. Subject to order 7 below, Pittmore to pay Mr Chan's costs of the appeal. 6. Subject to order 7 below, Mr Chan to pay Pittmore's and Mr Joo Kee Tan's costs of the cross-appeal. 7. No part of the cost of providing the eight volumes of white folders filed on 3 November 2020 is to be passed on by David Kam & Co, with the intent that the entirety of those costs be borne by that firm. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction – whether mistake in written agreement can be rectified by construction – inconsistency concerning right to terminate on face of document – primacy given to handwritten amendments COSTS – appeal books – unnecessary reproduction of thousands of pages already reproduced in appeal books – whether special order as to costs warranted DEEDS – delivery – whether deed restating terms of joint venture delivered to other side in escrow – whether terms of document precluded finding of delivery in escrow – whether deed even if not delivered effective as simple contract ELECTION AND WAIVER – where one party continued to perform work and incur expenses pursuant to joint venture after a contractual right of termination had accrued – absence of any reservation of rights – significance of "no waiver" clause EQUITY – ancillary liability – liability for procuring or inducing breach of trust or breach of fiduciary duty – whether requirement that third party be "dishonest" – whether separate bases of liability for procuring as opposed to inducing breach – whether director of company acting as such capable of procuring or inducing breach of trust by director's company EQUITY – rectification – whether contract should be rectified in equity if mistake incapable of being corrected by construction EQUITY – unconscionability – statutory unconscionability – joint venture to develop land for resale – offer made to one party to sell part of joint venture land at profit – offer communicated to other party with invitation to share profit – other party sought to persevere with joint venture – first party purported to terminate and sell land – finding that first party believed entitled to terminate – in fact first party not entitled to terminate – first party's conduct not unconscionable contrary to s 21 of Australian Consumer Law Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, s 21 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 38 Duties Act 1997 (NSW), s 17 Law of Property Act 1936 (SA), s 41AA Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), Pt 51 Cases Cited: Alleyne v Darcy (1854) 4 Ir Ch Rep 199 Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd (No 9) [2016] NSWSC 1005 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt (2019) 267 CLR 1; [2019] HCA 18 Australian Securities Commission v AS Nominees Ltd (1995) 62 FCR 504 Australian Super Developments Pty Ltd v Marriner [2014] VSC 464 Baden v Société Générale pour Favoriser le Dévelopment du Commerce et de l'Industrie en France SA [1993] 1 WLR 509 Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37; [2006] 1 WLR 1476 Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Boensch v Pascoe [2019] HCA 49; 94 ALJR 112 Bowker v Burdekin (1843) 11 M & W 128; 152 ER 744 Brooks v Burns Philp Trustee Co Ltd (1969) 121 CLR 432; [1969] HCA 4 Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & Co [1991] 3 SCR 534 Chickabo Pty Ltd v Zphere Pty Ltd (2019) 57 VR 406; [2019] VSC 73 CSR Ltd v Eddy (2005) 226 CLR 1; [2005] HCA 64 Daebo Shipping Co Ltd v The Ship Go Star (2012) 207 FCR 220; [2012] FCAFC 156 Eaves v Hickson (1861) 30 Beav 136; 54 ER 840 Edmonds v Donovan; Disctronics Ltd v Kingston Links Country Club Pty Ltd (2005) 12 VR 513; [2005] VSCA 27 Elders Trustee and Executor Co Ltd v E G Reeves Pty Ltd (1987) 78 ALR 193 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95; [2002] HCA 8 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Farah Constructions Pty Limited v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 Federal Commissioner v Taylor (1929) 42 CLR 80; [1929] HCA 13 Fightvision Pty Ltd v Onisforou (1999) 47 NSWLR 473; [1999] NSWCA 323 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420; [1956] HCA 53 Fyler v Fyler (1841) 3 Beav 550; 49 ER 216 Giorgiannai v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473; [1985] HCA 29 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101; [1999] HCA 10 Green Growth No 2 Ltd v Queen Elizabeth the Second National Trust [2019] 1 NZLR 161; [2018] NZSC 75 Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) (2012) 200 FCR 296; [2012] FCAFC 6 Hall v Bainbridge (1848) 12 QB 698; 116 ER 1032 Harker-Mortlock v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2019] NSWCA 56 Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (2014) 87 NSWLR 609; [2014] NSWCA 266 HDI Global Specialty SE v Wonkana No 3 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 296 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41; [1984] HCA 64 Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Australian Rugby Union Ltd (2001) 110 FCR 157; [2001] FCA 1040 In re Carile; Dakin v Trustees Executors and Agency Co Ltd [1920] VLR 427 Insurance Australia Ltd t/a NRMA Insurance v Milton [2016] NSWCA 156 Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd (t/a Crockfords Club) [2018] AC 391; [2017] UKSC 67 James Adam Pty Ltd v Fobeza Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 311 Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) (1953) 90 CLR 113; [1953] HCA 2 Jin Niu Investments Pty Ltd v Wang (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 649 Kation Pty Ltd v Lamru Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 145; 257 ALR 336 Khoury v Government Insurance Office (NSW) (1984) 165 CLR 622; [1984] HCA 55 King Network Group Pty Ltd v Club of the Clubs Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 344; 69 ACSR 172 Kronenberg v Bridge (2014) 26 Tas R 359; [2014] TASFC 10 KTC v David (No 1) [2019] NSWSC 281 Lady Naas v Westminster Bank Ltd [1940] AC 366 Lewski v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2016) 246 FCR 200; [2016] FCAFC 96 Luke v South Kensington Hotel Company (1879) 11 Ch D 121 Marriner v Australian Super Developments Pty Ltd (2012) 46 VR 213; [2012] VSCA 171 Marriner v Australian Super Developments Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 141 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2012] NSWSC 16 Midgley v Midgley [1893] 3 Ch D 282 Nielsen v Capital Finance Australia Ltd [2014] 2 Qd R 459; [2014] QCA 139 Norberg v Wynrib [1992] 2 SCR 226 O'Brien v Dawson (1941) 41 SR NSW 295 O'Brien v Dawson (1942) 66 CLR 18; [1942] HCA 8 OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] AC 1 Othman v Stanley [2011] VSC 211 Paciocco v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] FCAFC 50; 321 ALR 584 Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd (in liq) (2001) 207 CLR 165; [2001] HCA 31 Qantas Airways Ltd v Cameron (1996) 145 ALR 294 Re Coomber; Coomber v Coomber [1911] 1 Ch 723 Re Goile; ex parte Steelbuild Agencies Ltd [1963] NZLR 666 Realtek Holdings Pty Ltd v Wetamast Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1869 Robertson v French (1803) 4 East 130; 102 ER 779 Schmidt v Ahrkalimpa Pty Ltd (receiver appointed) [2020] VSCA 193 Scook v Premier Building Solutions Pty Ltd (2003) 28 WAR 124; [2003] WASCA 263 Segboer v A J Richardson Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 253; 16 BPR 31,235 Seymour Whyte Constructions Pty Ltd v Ostwald Bros Pty Ltd (In liquidation) (2019) 99 NSWLR 317; [2019] NSWCA 11 Sino Iron Pty Ltd v Palmer (No 3) [2015] 2 Qd R 574; [2015] QSC 94 Syrimi v Hinds (1996) 6 NTLR 1 Tallerman & Co Pty Ltd v Nathan's Merchandise (Vic) Pty Ltd (1957) 98 CLR 93; [1957] HCA 10 Taouk v Ho [2019] NSWCA 156 THC Holding Pty Ltd v CMA Recycling Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1136; 101 ACSR 202 The Juliana (1822) 2 Dods 504; 165 ER 1560 Thomas v Arthur Hughes Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1027 Trusts & Guarantee Co Ltd v Brenner [1933] SCR 656 Tsaprazis v Goldcrest Properties Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 206; 18 ACLC 285 Twigg v Twigg (No 4); Lambert v Twigg Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1159 Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] UKHL 12; [2002] 2 AC 164 Wilson v Frost (1935) 35 SR (NSW) 521 Wollongong Coal Ltd v Gujarat NRE India Pty Ltd (2019) 100 NSWLR 432; [2019] NSWCA 135 Xenos v Wickham (1867) LR 2 HL 296 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661; [1985] HCA 65 Youyang Pty Ltd v Minter Ellison Morris Fletcher (2003) 212 CLR 484; [2003] HCA 15 Texts Cited: P Davies, Accessory Liability (Hart Publishing, 2015) J Dietrich, "The Liability of Accessories under Statute, in Equity, and in Criminal Law: Some Common Problems and (Perhaps) Common Solutions" (2010) 34(1) Melb Uni L Rev 106 J Dietrich and P Ridge, Accessories in Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2015) G Dworkin, Odgers' The Construction of Deeds and Statutes (5th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 1967) Hon W Gummow, "Knowing assistance" (2013) 87 ALJ 311 Hon W Gummow, "The Equitable Duties of Company Directors" (2013) 87 ALJ 753 C Harpum, "The Basis of Equitable Liability" in P Birks (ed), The Frontiers of Liability (Oxford University Press, 1994) C Harpum, 'The Stranger as Constructive Trustee', (1986) 102 Law Quarterly Review 114 Rastell, Les Termes de la Ley P Ridge, "Equitable accessorial liability: Moving beyond Barnes v Addy" (2014) 8 Journal of Equity 28 N Seddon, Seddon on Deeds (Federation Press 2015) J Thomson, Commercial Contract Clauses (3rd ed, Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Ltd, 2019) D E C Yale, "The Delivery of a Deed" (1970) 28(1) Cambridge Law Journal 52 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pittmore Pty Ltd (Appellant, second cross-respondent) Edward Pei-Ying Chan (Respondent, cross-appellant) Joo Kee Tan (First cross-respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Christie SC, D Hume (Pittmore and Mr Tan) H K Insall SC, A A Wilson (Mr Chan)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate