NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Raymond Boutros Azizi v Council of the City of Ryde [2020] NSWLEC 180 Hearing dates: 12 October and 9 November 2020 Date of orders: 18 December 2020 Decision date: 18 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Duggan J Decision: See paragraphs 45 and 46 Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – subpoena – objection to production of documents – client legal privilege – section 41(3) Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensations) Act 1991 – whether Valuer-General is entitled to protection afforded by legal privilege – Valuer-General is entitled to such protection – relevant documents are privileged – no implied waiver of privilege Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 Cases Cited: Council of the City of Ryde v Azizi [2019] NSWSC 1605 The Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 ML Ubase Holdings Co Ltd v Trigem Computer Inc (2007) 69 NSWLR 577 New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd (In Liq) v Renaissance Reinsurance Ltd [2007] NSWSC 258 Waterford v Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Council of the City of Ryde (Applicant on the Motion) Valuer-General of New South Wales (Respondent on the Motion) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Hall SC (Applicant on the Motion) Mr H Pintos-Lopez and Ms Z Shahnawaz (Respondent on the Motion)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate