NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: De Lorenzo v De Lorenzo [2020] NSWCA 351 Hearing dates: 29 September 2020, further submissions 20 October 2020 and 5 November 2020 Decision date: 22 December 2020 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; White JA at [47]. Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – construction of will – gift of two shares to three children as tenants in common – will stated that if shares not divisible by three, daughter would receive more – whether daughter entitled to both shares under will – consideration of joint ownership of choses in action Legislation Cited: Companies (New South Wales) Code, Sch 3 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 140, 168, 169, 231, 237, 247A, 1070A Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 12, 26, 27, 66F, 66G Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), s 196 Judicature Act 1873 (UK), s 25 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Cases Cited: Beck v Henley [2014] NSWCA 201; 11 ASTLR 457 Blackborough v Graves (1673) 1 Mod Rep 102; 86 ER 765 Chhabra v McPherson as Trustee for the McPherson Practice Trust [2019] FCAFC 228 Christopher John De Lorenzo in his capacity as an executor of the Estate of the late Patricia Ellen De Lorenzo v Vincent Joseph De Lorenzo in his personal capacity & in his capacity as an executor of the Estate of the late Patricia Ellen De Lorenzo [2020] NSWSC 188 Clerk v Equity Trustees Executors and Agency Co Ltd (1913) 15 CLR 625; [1913] HCA 8 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v McDonald [2000] NSWSC 553; 10 BPR 18,111 Fell v Fell (1922) 31 CLR 268; [1922] HCA 55 Hatzantonis v Lawrence [2003] NSWSC 914 In Re Allan [1950] VLR 405 Lewin v Lewin [2019] NSWSC 380 Michael Victor Henley; In the Estate of Hedy Jadwiga Weinstock and Leo Arie Weinstock [2013] NSWSC 975; 10 ASTLR 1 Neilan v Neilan [2019] NSWSC 66 Nullagine Investments Pty Ltd v The Western Australian Club Inc (1993) 177 CLR 635; [1993] HCA 45 Parmalat Capital Finance Ltd v Food Holdings Ltd [2008] UKPC 23; [2009] 1 BCLC 274 Perrin v Morgan [1943] AC 399 Re McIlrath, decd [1959] VR 720 Re McKerrell [1912] 2 Ch 648 Re Pulbrook; Pulbrook v Pulbrook (1937) 37 SR (NSW) 345 Re VGM Holdings Ltd [1942] Ch 235 Re Wood Trading Co Ltd (1927) 28 SR (NSW) 106 Rule v Mallon [2000] NSWSC 346; (2000) 10 BPR 18,005 Russell v Scott (1936) 55 CLR 440; [1936] HCA 34 Saunders v Vautier (1841) Cr & Ph 240; 41 ER 482 Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2005) 146 FCR 183; [2005] FCAFC 144 Winter v Perratt (1843) 6 Man & G 314; 134 ER 914 Texts Cited: I Alexander, Copyright Law and the Public Interest in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 2010) C Butler (ed), Commentary upon Littleton (J & W T Clarke, 19th ed, 1832) Carter, Lane, Tolhurst and Peden, Helmore's Commercial Law and Personal Property in New South Wales (10th ed, Lawbook Co 1992) H Cary (ed), A Commentary on the Tenures of Littleton (Saunders and Benning, 1829) P Davies and S Worthington, Principles of Modern Company Law (9th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, 2012) Halsbury's Laws of Australia, Vol 19, "Personal Property" Halsbury's Laws of England (5th ed 2013), Vol 80, "Personal Property" F C Hutley "Conveyancing Act 1919 – 1938 (NSW), s 26 – Application to Choses in Action" (1939) 13 ALJ 230" F Pollock, Possession and the Common Law (Clarendon Press, 1888) C Sherrin et al, Williams on Wills (8th ed, Butterworths, 2002), Vol 1, p 791 R Smith, Plural Ownership (Oxford University Press, 2005) M Vitoria et al, The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs (4th ed, LexisNexis, 2011), Vol 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher John De Lorenzo (First Applicant) Jo-Ann De Lorenzo (Second Applicant) Vincent Joseph De Lorenzo (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Pike SC, J Burnett (Applicants) T Maltz (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate