NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Green (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 358 Hearing dates: 9 November 2020 Date of orders: 23 December 2020 Decision date: 23 December 2020 Before: Meagher JA at [1] Walton J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [58] Decision: (1) Pursuant to Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 10(1)(b), extend the time for the applicant to seek leave to appeal. (2) Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (3) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – proceeds of crime – commercial quantity of a border controlled drug – utilitarian value of plea – Xiao error established – re-sentencing – nature and circumstances of offences – financial gain – objective seriousness of counts – subjective features – mental health issues – discount for utilitarian value of plea and co-operation with authorities – general deterrence – personal deterrence – behaviour in custody – leave to appeal granted – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Bae v R [2020] NSWCCA 35 Baladjan v R [2018] NSWCCA 304 DL v The Queen (2018) 265 CLR 215; [2018] HCA 32 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Haouchar v R [2014] NSWCCA 227 Hijazi v R [2020] NSWCCA 97 Huang v R (2018) 96 NSWLR 743; [2018] NSWCCA 57 Jinde Huang aka Wei Liu v R (2018) 332 FLR 158; [2018] NSWCCA 70 Kaurasi v R [2020] NSWCCA 253 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 LB v R [2013] NSWCCA 70 Lehn v R (2016) 78 MVR 353; [2016] NSWCCA 255 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 O'Neile v R [2018] NSWCCA 291 R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1; [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Ehrlich (2012) 219 A Crim R 415; [2012] NSWCCA 38 R v Kaldow (2004) 150 A Crim R 271; [2004] NSWCCA 425 R v Lee [2007] NSWCCA 234 R v Nguyen; R v Pham (2010) 205 A Crim R 106; [2010] NSWCCA 238 R v Sukkar (2006) 172 A Crim R 151; [2006] NSWCCA 92 Robinson v R [2017] NSWCCA 315 Xiao v R (2018) 96 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCCA 4 Z v R [2014] NSWCCA 323 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aiden Green (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: S Talbert (Applicant) B Anniwell (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate