NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: EJW v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 326 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 23 December 2020 Decision date: 23 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: 1. Pursuant to s 55(2) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 no action will be taken on the matter. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — Legislation — Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) – exemption – whether service of a brief of evidence is an administrative function of the NSW Police Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Police Act 1990 (NSW) Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: AEC v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (GD) [2013] NSWADTAP 30 Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force v YK (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 78 Cran v State of NSW [2004] NSWCA 92 EFR v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 159 HW v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2003] NSWADT 214. Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: EJW (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: EJW (Self Represented) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00215847 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 publication of the name of the applicant is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate