NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MacLeod v Woollahra Municipal Council [2020] NSWLEC 183 Hearing dates: 15 and 17 December 2020 Date of orders: 24 December 2020 Decision date: 24 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders at [146] Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - application to install moveable glazing enclosure at the uppermost level of a building - application refused by the Council - review of Council's refusal results in further refusal - compliance with requirements of the Woollahra Development Control Plan 2015 - necessity for cl 4.6 request for dispensation from compliance with height of buildings control - consistency with streetscape and desired future character - extent of visibility from various locations in the public domain - if the proposal is acceptable on general merit bases, request for dispensation from compliance for the height of buildings development standard should be assumed - present northern façade of the prominent building highly visible from the public domain - present northern façade of the building symmetrical - two balcony enclosures approved in 2001 under different planning controls - 2001 balcony enclosures did not impact on the symmetry of the northern façade of the building - proposed development has unacceptable visual impact and impact on the desired future character of the locality - appeal dismissed and proposed development refused consent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995 Cases Cited: Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2018) 236 LGERA 256; [2018] NSWLEC 118 Rebel MH Neutral Bay Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWCA 130 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373; [2001] NSWCA 167 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Duncan MacLeod (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Griffiths, solicitor (Applicant) Mr J Fan, solicitor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate