NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sleiman v Strathfield Municipal Council [2020] NSWLEC 1686 Hearing dates: 10 September 2020 Date of orders: 30 December 2020 Decision date: 30 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: Appeal against refusal of permission for tree removal – tree listed as Significant by Council – tree is over mature – is the tree close to death – does the tree pose an unacceptable risk Legislation Cited: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural areas) 2017 Strathfield Local Environment Plan 2012 Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Sheldon v The Council of the City of Sydney [2020] NSWLEC 1619 Texts Cited: Benson D and Mc Dougall L, Ecology of Sydney Plant Species, (1998) International Society of Arboriculture, Tree Risk Assessment Training Manual, 2013 Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, 'COVID-19 Pandemic Arrangements Policy, (July 2020) Macmillan Dictionary Strathfield Consolidated Development Control Plan 2005 Category: Principal judgment Parties: William Sleiman (Applicant) Strathfield Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Nurpuri (Applicant) M Fozzard (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate