NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Aryal v R [2021] NSWCCA 2 Hearing dates: 26 November 2020 Decision date: 03 February 2021 Before: Johnson J at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Wilson J at [67] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence appeal – manifest excess – two counts of aggravated sexual assault in one episode – aggregate sentence - offender reckless as to accused's cognitive impairment – futile to attempt arithmetic as to accumulation and concurrency between indicatives and aggregate sentences – focus must be on whether aggregate reflects totality of criminality – sentence within judge's discretion given objective seriousness and no discounts – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61J(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 22A, 53A Cases Cited: Bell v R [2019] NSWCCA 251 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; (2014) 246 A Crim R 528 Kliendienst v R [2020] NSWCCA 98 Lee v R [2020] NSWCCA 244 Vaughan v R [2020] NSWCCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brijesh Aryal (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Howell (Applicant) Ms E Wilkins SC (Crown)
Solicitors: Matouk Joyner Lawyers Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2018/86059 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Citation: [2020] NSWDC 67 Date of Decision: 19 February 2020 Before: Bourke SC DCJ File Number(s): 2018/86059
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate