NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Omaya Investments Pty Ltd v Dean Street Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 2 Hearing dates: 26 October 2020 Decision date: 01 February 2021 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Payne JA at [82]; Brereton JA at [83] Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal from the judgment of the Land and Environment Court delivered on 5 March 2020. (2) Order that the appellants pay the first-third respondents' costs of the appeal on the ordinary basis and the costs of the fourth and fifth respondents on a submitting basis. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – development approval – variation of plans – formalities for approval of changes – whether requirement for written application – recording approval of certifying authority – notification of consent authority – effect of breach of regulations ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – enforcement proceedings – construction certificate – variation of development – whether construction certificate modified – whether work undertaken before approval by certifying authority – failure to notify consent authority – whether development unlawful Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 80, 81A, 109C, 109F, 109Q; Pts 4A, 6 Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Act 2017 (NSW), cll 4, 10, 14; Sch 6, Pt 6.2; Sch 13; Div 6.3 Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings, Transitional and Other Provisions) Regulation 2017 (NSW), cl 18 Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Building and Subdivision Certification) Regulation 2019 (NSW), cl 2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Regulation 2018 (NSW), cl 2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW), cll 139, 141, 142, 143B, 143C, 145, 147, 148; Pt 8, Div 2 Cases Cited: Burwood Council v Ralan Burwood Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] NSWCA 404 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Omaya Investments Pty Ltd (First Appellant) BSM Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Appellant) Dean Street Holdings Pty Ltd (First Respondent) TQM Design & Construct Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Patrick John Elias (Third Respondent) Maurice Freixas (Fourth Respondent) Burwood Council (Fifth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T F Robertson SC / J P Farrell (Appellants) C J Leggat SC / L Nurpuri (First, Second and Third Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate