NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sadiq v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 19 Hearing dates: 18 December 2020 Date of orders: 02 February 2021 Decision date: 02 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: Leave to proceed is refused under s 96(1)(a) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — Tribunals, commissions and other authorities — NCAT — whether leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave HUMAN RIGHTS — Legislation — Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) — disability – indirect discrimination Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 Clarke v Catholic Education Commission (2003) 202 ALR 340 Catholic Education Office v Clarke (2004) 138 FCR 121 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Hurst v State of Queensland (2006) 151 FCR 562 Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Limited [1999] NSWADT 73 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; 174 CLR 509 Wright v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 16 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Solape (Shona) Noimat Sadiq (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Jones (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate