NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Turnbull v Bridge Housing Limited [2021] NSWCATAP 18 Hearing dates: 25 November 2020 Date of orders: 2 February 2021 Decision date: 02 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Dr R Dubler SC, Senior Member L Wilson, Senior Member Decision: (1) Appeal is dismissed. (2) No order as to costs. (3) The stay entered on 21 September 2020 is lifted. Order 3 made on 20 July 2020 is enlivened, that is, by consent the tenant will allow the landlord and or its authorised contractor access to the property for the purposes of laying tiles in the bedroom providing that at least 48 hours' notice is given. Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL TENANCY – No procedural unfairness – No appealable errors Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: McDonald v McDonald [2016] NSWCATAP 252 Roney v NSW Land & Housing Corporation [2015] NSWCATAP 269 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rachael Turnbull (Appellant) Bridge Housing Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self- Represented) Respondent (Self-Represented) File Number(s): AP 20/33324 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: n/a Date of Decision: 20 July 2020 Before: J Ringrose, Tribunal Member File Number(s): SH20/19710
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate