NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ryan v NSW Minister for Planning and Open Spaces [2021] NSWCATAD 22 Hearing dates: 20 November 2020 Date of orders: 3 February 2021 Decision date: 03 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: R L Hamilton S C Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the agency concerning the confidential documents is affirmed. (2) Pursuant to sec 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 I order that the publication, or disclosure to the applicant, of evidence given before the Tribunal related to or contained in confidential documents lodged with the Tribunal be prohibited Catchwords: GOVERNMENT INFORMATION – refusal by agency to deal with application – sec 14 Table items 1(e) & (f) GIPA Act- Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police (NSW) v Camilleri [2012] NSWADTAP 19 Re Waterford and Department of Treasury (No. 2) (1984) 1 AAR 1 Wall v University of Sydney [2008] NSWADT 213 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Ryan- Applicant Minister for Planning and Open Spaces -Respondent Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00236183; 2020/00236213 Publication restriction: Pursuant to sec 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 I order that the publication, or disclosure to the applicant, of evidence given before the Tribunal related to or contained in confidential documents lodged with the Tribunal be prohibited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate