NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zahab v R [2021] NSWCCA 7 Hearing dates: 22 July 2020 Decision date: 05 February 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Garling J at [55]; Wright J at [62]; Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – onerous conditions of custody – limited evidence as to conditions – High Risk Management Correctional Centre (HRMCC) – whether sentencing judge failed to take conditions of custody into account on sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code (Cth) Cases Cited: Alameddine v R [2020] NSWCCA 232 C v R [2013] NSWCCA 81; 229 A Crim R 233 Khalid v R (2020) 102 NSWLR 160; [2020] NSWCCA 73 Lodhi v R [2007] NSWCCA 360; 179 A Crim R 470 R v Alameddine (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 681 R v Atai (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1797 R v Atik [2007] VSC 299 R v Durocher-Yvon (2003) 58 NSWLR 581; [2003] NSWCCA 299 R v Ferrer-Esis (1991) 55 A Crim R 231 R v HG [2018] NSWSC 1849 R v Khalid [2017] NSWSC 1365 R v Khan (No 11) [2019] NSWSC 594 R v Scott [2003] NSWCCA 28 R v Totten [2003] NSWCCA 207 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Haisem Zahab (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Smith SC with R El-Choufani (Applicant) P R McGuire SC with M Kalyk (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate