NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Queen v Gould [2020] NSWDC 831 Hearing dates: 30 March 2020; 7 April 2020; 8 April 2020; 19 August 2020; 2 November 2020; 17 December 2020 Date of orders: 17 December 2020 Decision date: 17 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Wilson SC DCJ Decision: Full time custodial sentence imposed. Orders at [216] – [220] Catchwords: CRIME – sentencing after jury trial – approach to determining facts for sentence – effect of Chiro v The Queen [2017] 260 CLR 425 – attempting to pervert the course of justice – s43 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – coaching witness to give false evidence in Federal Court Proceedings Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 66EA Crimes Act 1914 ss 16E, 16A, 17A, 19AB, 43 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 6 Cases Cited: AB v R [2014] NSWCCA 31 Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1 Chiro v The Queen [2017] 260 CLR 425 DPP v Page & Ors [2006] VSCA 224 Einfeld v R [2010] NSWCCA 87 Giourtalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 216 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520 Kenny v R [2010] NSWCCA 6 R v Achurch [2011] NSWCCA 186 R v Elomar [2018] NSWCCA 224 R v El Rashid (Unreported) NSWCCA 7 April 1995 R v Gregory (1996) 86 A Crim R 521 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (CDPP) Vanda Russell Gould (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Ms Single SC (CDPP) Ms Epstein (CDPP) Ms Rabsch (CDPP)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate