NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: JA v R [2021] NSWCCA 10 Hearing dates: 4 December 2020 Date of orders: 15 February 2021 Decision date: 15 February 2021 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Davies J at [3] Decision: (1) Extend time for the filing of the Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal to 17 August 2020; (2) Grant leave to appeal. (3) Allow the appeal. (4) Quash the sentence for the offence contrary to s 66A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) imposed by Judge Wilson SC in the District Court on 1 February 2019. (5) In lieu, sentence the appellant to a non-parole period of one year and three months commencing 25 November 2019 and expiring 24 February 2021 with a balance of term of five months expiring 24 July 2021. (6) The appellant is first eligible for parole on 24 February 2021. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – applicant charged with three separate offences – one child sex offence contrary to s 66A – child sex offence committed when applicant was aged 14 and victim aged 9 – applicant sentenced when aged 44 – offences of using a carriage service to menace/harass/offend and possession of child abuse material committed when applicant aged 39 - whether sentencing judge erred by having regard to current maximum penalty for offence – relevance of judge's comments during sentence hearing - whether s 25AA of the Sentencing Act relevant where maximum penalty increased since the date of the offence - where sentencing judge was aware of the maximum penalty and his obligation to have regard to that penalty – whether sentencing judge failed to have proper regard to principles concerning sentencing juveniles – whether sentence manifestly excessive - appeal allowed – applicant resentenced Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) s 6 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 66A, 91H Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s25AA Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) s 474.17(1) Cases Cited: BM v R [2019] NSWCCA 223 BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; (2010) 201 A Crim R 379 Dang v R [2014] NSWCCA 47 KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51; (2008) 182 A Crim R 571 Lonsdale v R [2020] NSWCCA 267 Mohindra v R [2020] NSWCCA 340 Paul Campbell v R [2018] NSWCCA 87 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v Elliott and Blessington (2006) 68 NSWLR 1; [2006] NSWCCA 305 R v Hearne [2001] NSWCCA 37; (2001) 124 A Crim R 451 R v JA [2019] NSWDC 314 R v JDB [205] NSWCCA 102 R v KBM [2004] NSWCCA 123 R v KLH [2004] NSWCCA 312; (2004) 148 A Crim R 515 R v RM [2015] NSWCCA 4; (2015) 248 A Crim R 408 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: JA (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Johnson (Applicant) C Young (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate