NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Williams (a pseudonym) [2020] NSWDC 836 Hearing dates: 19 June 2020 Decision date: 26 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: 1. The proposed prosecution tendency evidence can be admitted at trial. 2. The defence application for separate trials for each complainant is refused. Catchwords: CRIME - child sexual assault sexual intercourse – proposed joint trial - three complainants. EVIDENCE – admissibility of tendency evidence - temporal difference between counts - different genders - nature of relationship between accused and complainant. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - pre-trial rulings - separate trial application - admissibility of tendency evidence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: BC v R [2015] NSWCCA 327 BC v R [2019] NSWCCA 111 DJW v R [2015] NSWCCA 164 DPP v RDT [2018] NSWCCA 293 DS v R [2018] NSWCCA 195 IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14; (2016) 257 CLR 300 Lockyer v R (1996) 89 A Crim R 457 McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52 RH v R [2014] NSWCCA 71 Shamouil v R [2006] NSWCCA 112; (2006) 66 NSWLR 228 SK v R [2011] NSWCCA 292 TB v R [2019] NSWCCA 224 The Queen v Bauer (a pseudonym) [2018] HCA 40 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Scott Williams (the accused) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr Z Khan (for the accused) Ms N Keay, Crown Prosecutor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate