NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Westbury v The Owners – Strata Plan No 64061 [2021] NSWCATEN 3 Hearing dates: 5 August 2020 Date of orders: 12 February 2021 Decision date: 12 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Enforcement Before: Armstrong J, President J Boland AM ADCJ, Deputy President M Harrowell, Deputy President Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), an order is made dispensing with a hearing in relation to the admission of and reliance upon the documents marked Exhibits H and J. (2) The documents marked Exhibits H and J are admitted as evidence in the application. (3) Pursuant to s 77(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the respondent is to pay a pecuniary penalty in the sum of $6,600.00. (4) The respondent is to pay the costs of the applicants, such costs to be as agreed or assessed on an ordinary basis. Catchwords: CIVIL PENALTIES – application for civil pecuniary penalty under s 77 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 – discretion to impose pecuniary penalty – factors that may be considered when determining whether a pecuniary penalty is to be imposed and amount of the penalty – decision to impose penalty not affected by appointment of managing agent under s 237 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 EVIDENCE – whether to allow further or additional evidence - reopening of case CONSENT ORDERS – satisfaction of Tribunal– exercise of discretion - decline to make consent orders under ss 57 and 77 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 COSTS – s 60 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 – special circumstances Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) ss 59, 72, 75, 77 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 88K Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) ss 18B, 18F Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) ss 5, 9 Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW) (repealed) Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) s 237, 56, 57 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 5F Cases Cited: Armee v Brealey [2017] NSWCATAP 14 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Multimedia International Services Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 439 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2020] FCA 790 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Elm Financial Services Pty Ltd (2005) 55 ACSR 411; (2005) NSWSC 1020 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2006] NSWSC 826 Barbaro v The Queen (1914) 253 CLR 58 Commissioner for Fair Trading v Edward Lees Imports Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWCATAP 222 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46 In the matter of Macquarie Investment Management Limited [2016] NSWSC 1184 Director of Public Prosecutions v Khoury [2014] NSWCA 15; 306 ALR 86 Fair Work Ombudsman v Australian Workers' Union [2020] FCA 60 Gaskin v Ollerenshaw [2010] NSWSC 788 Jesseron Holdings Pty Limited v The Middle East Trading Consultants Pty Ltd (No 2) (1994) 122 ALR 717 McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 89 Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Mesiha v Murrell [2017] NSWCATAP 1 Ponzio v B & P Caelli Constructions Pty Ltd (2007) 158 FCR 543 at [93]; [2007] FCAFC 65 Telstra Corporation Limited v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2008] FCA 1436 The Owners – Strata Plan No 82306 v Anderson [2017] NSWCATCD 85 Urban Transit Authority v Nweiser (1982) 28 NSWLR 471 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Garth Westbury (First Applicant) Margaret Westbury (Second Applicant) The Owners – Strata Plan No 64061 (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Bradford (Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate