NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Holt v R (Cth) [2021] NSWCCA 14 Hearing dates: 26 November 2020 Date of orders: 19 February 2021 Decision date: 19 February 2021 Before: Johnson J at [1] R A Hulme J at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: 1 Leave to appeal granted 2 Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – Family Law Act offence – dealing with proceeds of crime – offence taken into account on s 16BA schedule – schedule offence of greater seriousness than principal offence – use of s 16BA schedules – propriety of "roll-up" offence where one count encompassed 64 acts - application of quantum of discount for plea of guilty in federal sentence matters - question of concurrence and accumulation – use of aggregate sentence in Federal sentencing - relevance of mental illness to sentence – amelioration of sentence not automatic Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 NSW Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Cases Cited: Abbas & Ors v R [2013] NSWCCA 115; (2013) 231 A Crim R 413 Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 581 Baden v R [2020] NSWCCA 23 Bae v R [2020] NSWCCA 35 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 CP v R [2009] NSWCCA 291; (2009) 213 A Crim R 26 Croxon v R [2017] NSWCCA 213 DG v R [2017] NSWCCA 139 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 205 A Crim R 1 DL v The Queen (2018) 265 CLR 215; [2018] HCA 32 DPP v Beattie (2017) 270 A Crim R 556; [2017] NSWCCA 301 El-Youssef v R [2010] NSWCCA 4 Huang v R (2018) 332 FLR 158; [2018] NSWCCA 70; (2018) 272 A Crim R 266 Kaurasi v R (Cth) [2020] NSWCCA 253 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 238 A Crim R 134 Milat v R, Klein v R [2014] NSWCCA 29 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009) 195 A Crim R 1; R v Eedens [2009] NSWCCA 254 R v Lamella [2014] NSWCCA 122 R v Ly [2014] NSWCCA 78 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 115 A Crim R 104 Singh v R [2018] NSWCCA 60 Xiao v R (Cth) (2018) 96 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCCA 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Timothy Holt (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Paingakulam (Applicant) S Flood (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate