NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gregor v Amaya [2021] NSWSC 89 Hearing dates: 2 February 2021 Decision date: 19 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Sackar J Decision: See para [54]-[55] Catchwords: EQUITY – Trusts and trustees – Resulting trusts – Presumption of resulting trust – Parent and child –Unequal contributions to purchase price – Parent and child EQUITY — Trusts and trustees — Resulting trusts — Presumption of advancement Legislation Cited: n/a Cases Cited: Black Uhlans Incorporated v New South Wales Crime Commission [2002] NSWSC 1060 Brown v Brown (1993) 31 NSWLR 582 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242; [1984] HCA 81 Charles Marshall Pty Ltd v Grimsley (1956) 95 CLR 353; [1956] HCA 28 Dyer v Dyer (1788) 2 Cox Eq Cas 92; (1788) 30 ER 42 Foundas v Arambatzis [2020] NSWCA 47 Fowkes v Pascoe (1875) LR 10 Ch App 343 Jain v Amit Laundry [2019] NSWCA 20 Micheletto (Trustee), El-Debel (Bankrupt) v El-Debel [2020] FCA 1031 Murtagh v Murtagh [2013] NSWSC 926 Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538; [1995] HCA 25 Ong v Lottwo Pty Ltd (in liq) (2013) 116 SASR 280; [2013] SASCFC 57 Ryan v Dries [2002] NSWCA 3; (2002) 10 BPR 19,947 Sivritas v Sivritas (2008) 23 VR 349; [2008] VSC 374 Tonna v Mendonca [2019] NSWSC 1849 Weige v Cupton Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 414 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anna Ligia Gregor (plaintiff) Ligia Manuela Amaya (defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Dooley (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate