NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zaidan v Vicinity Centres PM Pty Limited t/as Roselands Shopping Centre [2020] NSWDC 852 Hearing dates: 25 November 2020 26 November 2020 27 November 2020 Date of orders: 27 November 2020 Decision date: 27 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Montgomery DCJ Decision: 1. Judgment for the Defendant against the Plaintiff. 2. Plaintiff to pay the Defendant's costs of the proceedings. 3. Exhibits to be returned. Catchwords: Tort – Negligence – Slip & Fall – Foreseeability of Risk – Precautions Against the Risk of Harm – Whether the Defendant Failed to Take Reasonable Precautions Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ss 5B, 5B(1), 5B(1)(a), 5B(1)(b), 5B(1)(c), 5B(2), 5D Cases Cited: Bankstown Foundry Pty Ltd v Braistina [1986] 160 CLR 301; [1986] HCA at p 309 Drotem Pty Limited v Manning [2000] NSWCA 320 Garzo v Liverpool/Campbelltown Christian School Ltd & Anor [2012] NSWCA 151 Jandson Pty Ltd v Welsh [2008] NSWCA 317 at [21] Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 Schellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Ltd (1999) 200 CLR 121; [1999] HCA 18 Simon Felice v St George Masonic Club [2017] NSWDC 276 Springfield v Duncombe [2017] NSWCA [2017] NSWCA Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sulaiman Zaidan (Plaintiff) Vicinity Centres PM Pty Limited t/as Roselands Shopping Centre (Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate