NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Reddy v State of NSW; Tan v State of NSW [2021] NSWDC 25 Hearing dates: 20 July 2020 Date of orders: 19 February 2021 Decision date: 19 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Levy SC Decision: See paragraphs [105] to [108] for orders Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – contested notices of motion for discovery and setting aside a subpoena Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56,s 58 Crown Proceedings Act 1988 (NSW), s 5 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Law Reform (Vicarious Liability) Act 1983 (NSW), s 8 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 21.7 Cases Cited: Anderson v District Court of New South Wales (1992) 27 NSWLR 701 Commissioner of Police v Hughes [2009] NSWCA 306 Daniels v Fielding (1846) 16 M & W 200; 153 ER 1159 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hyder v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] NSWCA 336 ICAP Australia Pty Ltd v BCG Partners (Australia) Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 307 Nowlan v Marsland Transport Pty Ltd (2001) NSWLR 116; [2001] NSWCA 346 Ruddock v Taylor [2005] HCA 48; (2005) 222 CLR 612 Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 211 CLR 317; [2002] HCA 35 White v Overland [2001] FCA 1333 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Nathan Keith Reddy (Plaintiff 1) Anthony Tan (Plaintiff 2) State of NSW (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Barham (Plaintiffs) Mr D Hume (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate