NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Polsen v Harrison (No. 2) [2021] NSWSC 111 Hearing dates: 18 February 2021 Date of orders: 19 February 2021 Decision date: 19 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: I decline to recuse myself. Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – application for recusal of presiding judge at trial on grounds of apprehended bias – comments made about liability conclave process and arrangements made by the parties – context of application by plaintiff to significantly amend Statement of Claim on day 3 of trial – proposed deployment of problematic conclave report in support of application to amend Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Robert Colin Nicholls & Ors (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Reid v Commercial Club (Albury) Limited [2014] NSWCA 98 CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor [2019] HCA 50 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577; (2006); [2006] HCA 55; Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Chamoun v District Court of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 187 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie (2011)242 CLR 283 Barakat v Goritsas (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 36 Wehbe v Minister for Home Affairs (2018) 361 ALR1 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Katrina Marie Polsen (Plaintiff) Dr Harrison (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A J Bartley SC / JA Hillier (Plaintiff) M Windsor SC / M Hutchings (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate