NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Insurance Australia Group Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v Keen [2021] NSWSC 113 Hearing dates: 24 July 2020 Decision date: 19 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) The time for the filing of the Summons challenging the decision of the third defendant be extended to allow the summons, in that respect, to proceed; (2) Judgment for the first defendant; (3) Summons dismissed; (4) The plaintiff, Insurance Australia Group Limited t/as NRMA Insurance, shall pay the first defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Grounds of review other than procedural fairness – Motor Accidents Medical Assessment and application for review – jurisdictional error and error of law – failure to deal with causation and apportionment to pre-existing injury – failure to provide adequate reasons – failure to exercise jurisdiction and apply correct test – jurisdictional pre-condition for review – capacity to challenge original decision after internal refusal to refer for review – summons dismissed. Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Cervantes (2012) 61 MVR 443 Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v MacKenzie & Ors [2014] NSWSC 67 Ballas v Department of Education (State of NSW) [2020] NSWCA 86 Campbelltown City Council v Vegan (2006) 67 NSWLR 372; [2006] NSWCA 284 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Elliott v Insurance Australia t/as NRMA Insurance [2014] NSWSC 1848 Frost v Kourouche (2014) 86 NSWLR 214 Meeuwissen v Boden (2010) 78 NSWLR 143 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369 R v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 407 Rodger v De Gelder (2011) 80 NSWLR 594 Rodger v De Gelder & Anor (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 235 Vitaz v Westform (NSW) Pty Limited and Ors [2011] NSWCA 254 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480 Wishart v Fraser (1941) 64 CLR 470 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Insurance Australia Group Limited t/as NRMA Insurance (Plaintiff) Timothy Keen (First Defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Second Defendant) Ian Meakin in his capacity as Authorised Officer of the NSW Food Authority (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Robinson SC / J Gumbert (Plaintiff) D Hooke SC / K Andrews (First Defendant) Submitting Appearance (Second/Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate