NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R (Cth) v Mohr (No. 4) [2020] NSWSC 1940 Hearing dates: 28 February 2020 Date of orders: 28 February 2020 Decision date: 28 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: Discharge of juror under s 53B(b) and s 54B(d) Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – discharge of juror – conspiracy to import a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug – conduct of a juror observed by Court Officer – reasonable apprehension of bias of a juror – inquiries by juror concerning the accused's transport to court proceedings – inquiries by juror concerning whether the juror could make contact with the accused at the conclusion of the trial – juror's behaviour in jury smoking area – s 55D(a) Jury Act - examination of juror pursuant to s 55D(a) – s 68C Jury Act – juror's behaviour during questioning by the Court – impartiality of a juror – optimal position that a jury of 12 will hear and determine criminal charges – s 53B(b) Jury Act – s 53B(d) Jury Act – ability of juror to perform his functions Legislation Cited: Jury Act 1977 (NSW) Cases Cited: Wu v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 99; [1999] HCA 52 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Darren Mohr (Accused) Representation: Counsel: M England/C McGorey (Crown) G Brady SC (Accused)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Crown) McGirr Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2017/376756 Publication restriction: Judgment previously restricted pending finalisation of all co-accused trials and related appeals.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate