NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: DGF Property Holdings Pty Limited v Di Federico (No 4) [2021] NSWSC 157 Hearing dates: 3 July 2020 (Submissions 6 July 2020); Directions 21 July 2020 Date of orders: 2 March 2021 Decision date: 02 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Emmett AJA Decision: Order that: 1. The Plaintiff, within 14 days, file and serve Proposed Short Minutes of Orders giving effect to these reasons and the earlier judgments. 2. The Defendants, within a further 14 days, file and serve a note indicating any dispute with the proposed orders. 3. If there is any dispute, each of the parties has leave to apply for the purpose of fixing a date for further argument. 4. If there is no dispute as to the proposed orders, judgment be entered in accordance with the proposed orders. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — court administration — court powers — recall of prior reasons in proceedings — circumstances — observations made per incuriam — court not yet functus officio — final orders yet to be made — whether power to recall based upon UCPR r 36.17 CONTRACTS — remedies — damages — assessment — quantum dependent on prior loan agreements — whether evidence capable of establishing terms of such loan agreements CORPORATIONS — formation — pre-registration contracts — requirements of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 131 — whether evidence established that "a person" purported to enter a contract on behalf of or for the benefit of a company prior to registration — whether conduct of company shareholders or director capable of ratifying purported agreements after registration Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66ZL Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 131 Conveyancing Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW), r 36.17 Cases Cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1987) 9 NSWLR 310 Babcock International Ltd v Babcock Australia Ltd; Babcock Australia Ltd v Eraring Energy (2003) 56 NSWLR 51; [2003] NSWCA 6 BJ McAdam Pty Ltd v Jax Tyres Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1438 Black v Smallwood (1966) 117 CLR 52; [1966] HCA 2 Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 DGF Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Di Federico; DGF Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Butros [2018] NSWSC 344 DGF Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Di Federico; DGF Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Butros (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1137 DGF Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Di Federico (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 510 Ex parte Harper; Re Rosenfield [1964-5] NSWR 58 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 Kelner v Baxter (1866) LR 2 CP 174 Painaway Australia Pty Ltd v JAKL Group Pty Ltd (2011) 249 FLR 1; [2011] NSWSC 205 Re Express Engineering Works Ltd [1920] 1 Ch 466; All ER Rep Ext 850 Sydney Appliances Pty Ltd (in liq) v Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 32; 33 ACSR 680 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 Verschures Creameries Ltd v Hull & Netherlands Steamship Company Ltd [1921] 2 KB 608 Texts Cited: G Dal Pont, Law of Agency (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2014) W Bowstead, FMB Reynolds, P Watts, Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (19th ed, 2010, Sweet & Maxwell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: DGF Property Holdings Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Enzo Di Federico (First Defendant) Franca Di Federico (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Sirtes SC with P Barham (Plaintiff) M Ashhurst SC (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate