NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gorgis v R [2021] NSWCCA 31 Hearing dates: 31 August 2020 Decision date: 15 March 2021 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Button J at [2] N Adams J at [99] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted. (2) Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — dishonestly obtain financial advantage by deception — plea of guilty entered and agreed facts signed whilst represented — co-accused in joint criminal enterprise acquitted by direction at subsequent trial — application for withdrawal of guilty plea refused — where guilty plea said to be entered for convenience and not genuine consciousness of guilt — asserted defect in Crown case with regard to causation Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 192E Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 2017 [2019] HCA 9; 93 ALJR 424 Meissner v the Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132; [1995] HCA 41 R v Ho (1989) 39 A Crim R 145 R v Prasad (1979) 23 SASR 161 R v SL [2004] NSWCCA 397 R v Thalari (2009) 75 NSWLR 307; [2009] NSWCCA 170 Wong v DPP (NSW) [2005] NSWSC 129; (2005) 155 A Crim R 37 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alan Gorgis (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Edwardson QC with N Mikhaiel (Applicant) M Millward (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate