NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Irwin v Pamplin [2021] NSWSC 208 Hearing dates: 11, 16, 25 February; 9, 24, 25 March 2021 Date of orders: 29 March 2021 Decision date: 25 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [73] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – interim preservation – plaintiff claims trust over assets including real property held by natural person and companies owned by her – both natural person and companies alleged to be trustees – prima facie case – balance of convenience – delay – interlocutory injunction granted against natural person dealing with assets held by her, including company shares, but refused against companies – limited interlocutory injunction granted against exercise of powers as trustee Cases Cited: Autodesk v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 Estate of Pamplin, Irwin v Pamplin [2017] NSWSC 1477 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Ann Margaret Irwin (Plaintiff/First Applicant) Marie Dawn Pamplin (First Defendant/Respondent) Lionel Joseph Pamplin (Second Defendant/Respondent) Mircon Pty Ltd (Third Defendant/Respondent) Dennis G Pamplin Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant/Respondent) Halcrows Investments Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant/Respondent) NMOS Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant/Respondent) The Peak on Andrew Pty Ltd (Seventh Defendant/Respondent) Mircorp International (Eighth Defendant/Respondent) OSCO (Australia) (Ninth Defendant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC/M Stevens (Applicant) G George (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate