NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Else v Transport for NSW [2021] NSWCATAD 59 Hearing dates: 13 November 2020 and written submissions by 24 December 2020. Date of orders: 12 March 2021 Decision date: 12 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Wall, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of NSW Treasury dated 22 November 2019 is varied to the following effect: (a) Items [5], [14] and [35] be released to the Applicant within 28 days of the publication of these reasons. (b) Items [3], [7] and [12] be remitted to the agency for reconsideration. (c) items [9], [10] and [16] be remitted to the agency for reconsideration and redaction in accordance with these reasons. (d) the decision of Transport NSW is otherwise affirmed. (2) Pursuant to s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 disclosure of: (a) the material filed by the respondent on a confidential basis, (b) those paragraphs of these reasons identified as [NOT FOR PUBLICATION], (c) the submissions made in private before the Tribunal, and (d) the record of that part of the proceedings conducted in private pursuant to s 49 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, is prohibited. That material is not to be released to the applicant or the public. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW. Government Information (Public Access) – public interest considerations in favour of disclosure – public interest considerations against disclosure – whether endanger or prejudice any system or procedure for protecting the safety of any person - whether facilitate the commission of a criminal offence – whether prejudice the effective exercise of an agency's functions - clauses 1(f), 2(d) and 2(f) of the table in s14. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Transport Administration Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Veall v Department of Planning and Environment [2018] NSWCATAD 47 MI skelly v Secretary, Department of Education [2019] NSWCATAD 48 Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 198 Roy v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2012] NSWADT 120 Hall v Department of Premier and Cabinet (NSW) [2012] NSWADT 46 Attorney General's Department v Cockcroft [1986] FCA 35; (1986) 10 FCR 180 at 190 Forbidden Foods Pty Ltd v Rice Marketing Board of New South Wales [2020] NSWCATAD 18 Newcastle City Council v Newcastle East Residents Action Group [2018] NSWCATAP 254 Meacham v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 107 Electoral Commissioner, State Electoral Office v McCabe [2003] NSWADTAP 28 Griffin v Sydney Trains [2020] NSWCATAD 234 Hutchinson v Roads and Traffic Authority [2006] NSWADT 147 Wordsworth v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWCATAD 201 Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307 Flack v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2011] NSWADT 28 Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs v Binnie [1989] V.R. 836 Destination NSW V Taylor [2019] NSWCATAP 123. Page v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 163 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sylvia Else (Applicant) Transport for NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Edwards (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate