NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Culbert v R [2021] NSWCCA 38 Hearing dates: 15 February 2021 Decision date: 18 March 2021 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; R A Hulme J at [74]; Adamson J at [75] Decision: (1) The non-publication order made by Judge Weber SC in respect of the name of the applicant is revoked. (2) Leave to appeal against that part of Ground 1 raising the issue of double counting is refused. (3) Otherwise, leave to appeal against sentence is granted. (4) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – sexual offending against three victims taking place over 18 years – whether sentence manifestly excessive. CRIMINAL LAW — Appeal against sentence — Aggravating factor per s 21A(2)(g) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) — Use of Victim Impact Statements — Whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 67 Corby v R [2010] NSWCCA 146 Corliss v R [2020] NSWCCA 65 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 DS v R [2017] NSWCCA 37 Gagan (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 47 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; (2014) 246 A Crim R 528 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Marrow v R [2015] NSWCCA 282 Muggleton v R (2015) 250 A Crim R 180; [2015] NSWCCA 62 Obeid v R [2017] 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Ollis v R [2011] NSWCCA 155 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56; (2014) 239 A Crim R 469 R v GC [2020] NSWDC 186 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v Nelson [2016] NSWCCA 130 R v Thomas [2007] NSWCCA 269 R v Tuala (2015) 248 A Crim R 502; [2015] NSWCCA 8 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 219 RP v R [2013] NSWCCA 192 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Truong v R; R v Le; Nguyen v R; R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 36 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; (2012) 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gary Anthony Culbert – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: S Kluss – Applicant S Traynor – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate