NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bertucci v Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) [2021] NSWSC 240 Hearing dates: 4 March 2021 Date of orders: 17 March 2021 Decision date: 17 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Bail refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – bail – show cause requirement – combination of circumstances – delay – assessment of strength of prosecution case – family circumstances – possible diagnosis of ADHD in applicant's son – large surety available – electronic monitoring Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), ss 16B, 17, 19 Criminal Code (Cth), s 307.1 Cases Cited: Barr (a pseudonym) v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2018] NSWCA 47 Boatswain v R [2019] NSWCCA 238 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Zaiter [2016] NSWCCA 247 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Mawad [2015] NSWCCA 227 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Tikomailmaleya [2015] NSWCA 83 Director of Public Prosecutions v Hourigan [2017] NSWCCA 170 JM v R [2015] NSWSC 978 Mohr v R (Supreme Court of NSW, Hamill J, 22 December 2017, unrep) Moukhallaletti v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWCCA 314 R v Bail Applicant M [2020] NSWSC 1685 R v Gountounas [2018] NSWCCA 40 R v Marcus [2016] NSWCCA 237 R v Mawad [2015] NSWSC 1237 R v Xi [2015] NSWSC 1575 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nathan Bertucci (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Lloyd QC (Applicant) R Rodger (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate