NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lin [2021] NSWDC 70 Hearing dates: 4 February 2021 Date of orders: 4 February 2021 Decision date: 04 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Buscombe DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence imposed one of two years and four months to be served by way of Intensive Correction Order. Catchwords: CRIME — Violent offences — Armed robbery — Offensive weapon CRIME — Custody of prohibited weapon CRIME — Property offences — Goods in custody Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 97(1) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1996 (NSW) s 3A Cases Cited: Bullock v The Queen [2016] NSWCCA 131 BP v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 159 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecution (Crown) Kyle Lin (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Chin (Crown) Mr J Kalantar (Offender)
Solicitors: File Number(s): 2020/7408 Publication restriction: Nil
SENTENCE
Introduction 1. The offender, Mr Lin, pleaded guilty in the Local Court and adhered to those pleas before me to the following offences. The first being that on 4 January 2020, in Redfern, he attempted to rob Lorna Zhou of money whilst being armed with an offensive weapon, namely what appeared to be a car key. That is an offence under s 97 subs (1) of the Crimes Act and it carries a maximum of 20 years imprisonment. There is no applicable standard non-parole period. 2. The second offence is an offence that on the same date he possessed a prohibited weapon, namely a flick knife, with a nine centimetre blade without being authorised to do so by a permit. That offence is an offence under s 7 subs (1) of the Weapons Prohibition Act and has a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of five years. The offender acknowledges his guilt in relation to an offence of goods in custody, the amount being $7,971.05 and asks that I take that into account when imposing the sentence on possess prohibited weapon offence. 3. In the circumstances of that offence here, the offence on the Form 1 does not have a significant impact upon the sentence I will impose on the prohibited weapon offence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate