NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Robert Cramp v Commissioner of Police (No. 2) [2021] NSWDC 79 Hearing dates: 3, 16 and 19 March 2021 Date of orders: 19 March 2021 Decision date: 19 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Priestley SC DCJ Decision: 19 March 2021 Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Case management — Pre-Trial Judgement - Police legally seized mobile phone from the applicant. The prosecution seeks to rely upon the contents of the phone. - Applicant maintains the phone may contain information material to his defence seeks an order to return the phone. Legislation Cited: Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (LEPRA) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: McQueen v Hawi [2008] NSWSC 136 Joukhador v Cmr of Police [2020] NSWSC 227 Fantakis v Commissioner of Police [2013] NSWSC Tye v Commissioner of Police (1995) 84 A Crim R 147 Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1980] 1 QB 49 Gollan v Nugent [1988] HCA 59; 166 CLR 18 Whealy J and Ghani v Jones [1970] 1 QB 693 Smethurst & anor v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police & Anor (2020) Marinko v Rames unrep NSWSC 13.8.71 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Crown (Regina) Cramp (Accused) Representation: Regener Solicitor for the Commissioner of Police Hogan Solicitor for the Accused File Number(s): 2019/00347837 Publication restriction: Unrestricted.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate