NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Singh (No 7) [2021] NSWSC 267 Hearing dates: 19, 20, 21 October 2020 and 3 March 2021 Date of orders: 3 March 2021 Decision date: 03 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: See [24] Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — application to exclude evidence – s 137 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – where defence sought the exclusion of evidence based on unreliability – evidence of EFIMS records and statement of detective as to where certain items were found – held, reliability is a matter for the jury – evidence admissible Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 55, 76, 97, 135, 137 Cases Cited: Colby v The Queen [1999] NSWCCA 261 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 R v Shamouil (2006) 66 NSWLR 228; [2006] NSWCCA 112 R v Singh (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1911 R v Singh (No 4) [2021] NSWSC 75 R v Singh (No 5) [2021] NSWSC 76 R v XY (2013) 84 NSWLR 363; [2013] NSWCCA 121 The Queen v Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018) 266 CLR 56; [2018] HCA 40 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Kulwinder Singh (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Hogan (Crown) Ms M Cunneen SC (Accused)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Michael Vassili Barristers and Solicitors (Accused) File Number(s): 2017/00330134
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate