NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Moavenian v Transport for NSW [2021] NSWCATAD 77 Hearing dates: 10 March 2021 Date of orders: 26 March 2021 Decision date: 26 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: Leave for the complaints to proceed under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 is refused. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — equal opportunity — whether leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave HUMAN RIGHTS – equal opportunity — discrimination on ground of race – qualifying bodies – victimisation Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Driving Instructors Act 1992 (NSW) Cases Cited: Carroll v Department of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCATAD 82 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Elliott v Nanda & Commonwealth [2001] FCA 418 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hossein Moavenian (Applicant) Transport for NSW (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police (Second Respondent) Andrew Cotton (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Waters (Applicant)
Solicitors: Illawarra Legal Centre (Applicant) Crown Solicitor (First Respondent) Kingston Reid (Second and Third Respondents) File Number(s): 2020/00365381 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate