NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Charlotte Pass Snow Resort Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 37 Hearing dates: 16, 18 and 22 (further written submissions) December 2020 Date of orders: 23 April 2021 Decision date: 23 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Pepper J Decision: See orders at [154]. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES: defendant charged with pollute waters offence and breach of licence offence in separate summonses – whether summonses should be set aside on the grounds of duplicity – alternatively whether the prosecutor should be required to elect to seek leave to amend the summonses to avoid the duplicity – applicable legal principles – whether the activity the subject of the offences constitutes a continuing offence – whether the activity the subject of the offences constitutes a single criminal enterprise – proper construction of condition O2.1(a) of licence – whether a duty imposed upon licensee to ensure compliance with condition O2.1(a) – whether person who contravened condition of licence clearly identified in the breach licence offence summons – pollute waters offence duplicitous – breach of licence offence not duplicitous – breach of licence offence known to law – breach of licence offence not time barred. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 5AE Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, ss 43(d), 55, 63, 64(1), 120(1), 122(1)(b), 216(1)(b) Cases Cited: Attorney General (NSW) v Built NSW Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCCA 299; (2013) 239 IR 102 Brownlie v State Pollution Control Commission (1992) 27 NSWLR 78 Director of Public Prosecutions v Merriman [1973] AC 584 Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority [2000] NSWCCA 367; (2000) 50 NSWLR 127 Environment Protection Authority v Bartter Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWLEC 114 Environment Protection Authority v Grafil Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v MacKenzie [2019] NSWCCA 174; (2019) 238 LGERA 147 Environment Protection Authority v Riverina Australia Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCCA 165; (2015) 90 NSWLR 57 Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation Ltd (1997) 98 LGERA 361 Environment Protection Authority v Truegain Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCCA 204; (2013) 85 NSWLR 125 Hakim v Waterways Authority (NSW) [2006] NSWCCA 376; (2006) 149 LGERA 415 Hamzy v R (1994) 74 A Crim R 341 Hannes v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (No 2) [2006] NSWCCA 373; (2006) 165 A Crim R 151 Hedberg v Wodhal [1913] HCA 2; (1913) 15 CLR 531 Johnson v Miller [1937] HCA 77; (1937) 59 CLR 467 Kiangatha Holdings Pty Ltd v Water NSW [2020] NSWCCA 263 S v R [1989] HCA 66; (1989) 168 CLR 266 Snowy Monaro Regional Council v Tropic Asphalts Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCCA 202; (2018) 362 ALR 359 Walsh v Tattersall [1996] HCA 26; (1996) 188 CLR 77 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Charlotte Pass Snow Resort Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Rose (Prosecutor) T Brennan SC with E Steer (Defendant) Solicitors: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Norton White (Defendant) File Number(s): 2020/200270 and 2020/200271
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate