NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sergei Sergienko v AXL Financial Pty Limited [2021] NSWSC 297 Hearing dates: 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 March 2021 Decision date: 26 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff for money amounts (2) Orders for specific performance for a Deed of Settlement (3) Declaration that the first defendant breached its obligations as the trustee of the fifth defendant and that the fifth defendant is entitled to equitable compensation Catchwords: EQUITY – CONTRACT – equitable interests in real property – priorities – specific performance of a Deed of Settlement (the Deed) requiring the granting of a legal mortgage – construction – parties entered into the Deed settling earlier litigation which required the defendant in that litigation to pay certain amounts and secure its obligations by granting a mortgage over unencumbered real property owned by it – property was held in trust for another party – where the parties to the earlier litigation had agreed outside the terms of the Deed not to report or make any complaint about illegal conduct – construction of provisions of the Deed requiring payment and extent of the obligations secured – whether the Court should withhold specific performance of the Deed – who as between the plaintiff and the beneficial owner of the property has priority – claim by the owner of the land against its trustee for equitable compensation for breach of trust Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Duties Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abigail v Lapin (1934) 51 CLR 58 HDI Global Specialty SE v Wonkana No. 3 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 296 Hyde v Reliance (1983) 154 CLR 326 Latec Investments Ltd v Hotel Terrigal Pty Ltd (1965) 113 CLR 265 MacFarlane v Daniell (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 337 North v Marra Developments Limited (1981) 148 CLR 42 Valoutin Pty Ltd v Furst (1998) 154 ALR 119 Young v Jackman (1986) 7 NSWLR 97 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sergei Sergienko – Plaintiff/Fourth Cross-Defendant to the Second Cross-Claim AXL Financial Pty Limited – First Defendant/Cross-Claimant to the First Cross-Claim/First Cross-Defendant to the Second Cross-Claim Oliver Roths – Second Defendant Roths Holdings Australia Pty Ltd – Third Defendant IWC Industries Pty Limited – Fourth Defendant/First Cross-Claimant to the Second Cross-Claim DK Excavations and Concreting Pty Ltd – Fifth Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant to the Second Cross-Claim AXL Capital Partners Pty Ltd – Cross-Defendant to the First Cross-Claim/Second Cross-Defendant to the Second Cross-Claim Ian Robert Chalmers – Third Cross-Defendant to the Second Cross-Claim Representation: Counsel: B Coles QC with D Meyerowitz-Katz – Plaintiff/Fourth Cross-Defendant to the Second Cross-Claim T Rogan – Fourth and Fifth Defendants/First and Second Cross-Claimants to the Second Cross-Claim IR Chalmers (director) - Cross-Defendant to the First Cross-Claim/Second Cross-Defendant to the Second Cross-Claim/ Third Cross-Defendant to the Second Cross-Claim (self-represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate