NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Treetop Adventure Park The Hills Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 1157 Hearing dates: 17-18 December 2020, written submissions on 20 January 2021 and 9, 15, 19 February 2021 Date of orders: 30 March 2021 Decision date: 30 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C and Shiels AC Decision: Proceedings 2020/205869 The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) The s 4.55(1A) application 1402/2013/HC/A to modify development consent 1402/2013/HC is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A. (3) As a consequence of order (2) above, the development consent 1402/2013/HC is subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of consent at Annexure B. (4) The exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits A, B and J. Proceedings 2019/302392 The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) The Noise Control Notice issued by The Hills Shire Council on 23 September 2019 is revoked. Catchwords: APPEAL – modification application concerning acoustic condition – noise control notice – agreement reached on modification application – whether noise control notice should be modified or revoked Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4.15, 4.55, 8.9 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 ss 264, 265, 267A, 267B, 290 The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2019 Cases Cited: Martin v Campbelltown City Council [2000] NSWLEC 228 Sumar Produce Pty Limited v Griffith City Council [2000] NSWLEC 27 Sumar Produce Pty Limited v Griffith City Council [2000] NSWLEC 72 Sumar Produce Pty Ltd v Griffith City Council [2000] NSWLEC 104 Texts Cited: Noise Policy for Industry The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Treetop Adventure Park The Hills Pty Ltd (Applicant) The Hills Shire Council (Respondent) Peter Edwards (First Intervenor) Anne Edwards (Second Intervenor) Representation: Counsel: A Pickles (Applicant) J Smith (Respondent) N Eastman (Intervenors)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate