NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Costellia-Kamm (Final) [2021] NSWSC 322 Hearing dates: 23 March 2021 Date of orders: 1 April 2021 Decision date: 01 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: See paragraph 73 Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 – final hearing – application for extended supervision order – Court's discretion to dismiss application – disputed conditions – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) ss 5B; 9(1)(b); 10(3); 10(A); 10(C); 11; 21; 61M(1); 61O(1); 66C(2) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Amendment Act 2017 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 140(2) Criminal Code (Cth) Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 4) (2017) 95 NSWLR 179; [2017] NSWCA 189 Lynn v State of New South Wales (2006) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 Minister for Home Affairs v Benbrika [2021] HCA 4 State of New South Wales v Barrie (Second Final) [2019] NSWSC 1161 State of New South Wales v Kamm (Final) [2016] NSWSC 1 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) William Costellia-Kamm (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms G Wright (Plaintiff) Mr M Robinson SC with Ms J Alderson
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate