NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Edwards v R [2021] NSWCCA 57 Hearing dates: 15 March 2021 Date of orders: 9 April 2021 Decision date: 09 April 2021 Before: Payne JA at [1] Bellew J at [4] Button J at [69] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Sentence – Application for leave to appeal against sentence – Where applicant pleaded guilty to one count of stealing from the person of another and one count of robbery in company – Additional count of robbery in company contained in a Form 1 – Robbery at a convenience store – Where the applicant snatched a wallet from a customer before returning to the store and producing a knife and threatening the proprietors – Where the applicant threatened the safety of the proprietors' four year old child if his demand for money was not met – Where the applicant was aged 18 at the time of the offending and had a significantly disadvantaged upbringing in which he was consistently exposed to abuse – Where the applicant had a lengthy criminal history and was on bail and on probation at the time of the offending – Whether the sentencing judge was "distracted" from a proper consideration of the applicant's subjective case by his application of the relevant guideline – Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly analyse the applicant's lengthy criminal history – Whether sentence was manifestly excessive bearing in mind the applicant's subjective case – Leave to appeal granted - Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 57; [2013] HCA 37 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Power and ors. v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623; [1974] HCA 26 R v Amati [2019] NSWCCA 193 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Murchie [1999] NSWCCA 424; (1999) 108 A Crim R 482 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704; [2001] NSWCCA 534 Ryan v R [2009] NSWCCA 183 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dwayne Edwards – Applicant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel: P Coady – Applicant C Young – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate