NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: GR v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2021] NSWCA 52 Hearing dates: 29 March 2021 Date of orders: 6 April 2021 Decision date: 06 April 2021 Before: Meagher JA Decision: (1) Direct the hearing of the summons for leave to appeal filed 23 March 2021 be expedited. (2) Otherwise dismiss the application for the orders sought in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the motion. (3) Dismiss the application for the order sought in paragraph 3 of the motion. (4) Dismiss the application for the order sought in paragraph 4 of the motion. (5) Order the applicant pay the first and second respondents' costs of the motion. (6) List the application for leave for directions before the Registrar at 9:45am on Wednesday 7 April 2021. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — leave to appeal — application for concurrent hearing of leave application and appeal — application for expedited hearing — no issue of principle CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — application for stay of care orders made by Children's Court pending determination of appeal proceedings — no issue of principle CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — application to set aside order appointing guardian ad litem — no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection Act) 1998 (NSW), ss 79, 91, 100 Children's Court Act 1987 (NSW), s 22A Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rules 36.16, 51.14 Cases Cited: GR v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2020] NSWSC 739 GR v Secretary, Department of Families, Disabilities and Community Services (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 198 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: GR (applicant) Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (first respondent) The Minister, Families, Disabilities and Community Services (second respondent) BB (the father) (third respondent) Krstina Wooi (fourth respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant self-represented Mr M Anderson (first and second respondents) Third respondent self-represented Ms E Stolier (fourth respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate