NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 33) [2021] NSWSC 340 Hearing dates: 23, 24 November 2020 Date of orders: 24 November 2020 Decision date: 09 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Jury provided with transcripts of the closing addresses made on behalf of each of the accused, subject to minor amendments. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – jury request for transcripts of addresses – no provision in Jury Act – discretion to provide – long and complex trial – careful and thorough addresses – discretion exercised to comply with jury request Legislation Cited: Jury Act 1977 (NSW), s 55C Cases Cited: R v Bartle & Ors (2003) 181 FLR 1; [2003] NSWCCA 329 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 66) [2016] NSWSC 1403 R v Taousanis [1999] NSWSC 107; 146 A Crim R 303 Regina v Sukkar [2005] NSWCCA 54 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina Abdallah Hassan Al Batat Ying Cheng Luo Ian Fan Jaiyu Liu Jacob Blake Bayliss Nai An Li Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Crown) B Rigg SC (Al Batat) R Webb (Luo) T Quilter (Fan) N Carroll (Liu) A Norrie (Bayliss) D Carroll (Li)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP (Crown) TS Law Firm (Al Batat) Voros Lawyers (Luo) Zahr & Partners (Fan) George Sten & Co (Liu) Ross Hill Lawyers (Bayliss) Younes & Espiner (Li) File Number(s): 2018/214586 (Al Batat) 2017/170943 (Luo) 2017/168582 (Fan) 2017/168476 (Liu) 2017/321618 (Bayliss) 2018/214894 (Li)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate