NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Brookman [2021] NSWDC 110 Hearing dates: 23 – 24 March 2021 Date of orders: 25 March 2021 Decision date: 25 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraphs 71, 93, 110, 151, 178 Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – historical sexual assault offence – pre-trial applications – application to adduce evidence regarding complainant's sexual experience – Criminal Procedure Act (NSW) s 293 – application for trial by judge alone – concern about 'unfair prejudice' arising from apprehended disclosure of accused undergoing sexual reorientation after alleged offending – relevance of COVID-19 measures post lockdown EVIDENCE – criminal proceeding – tendency evidence – presumption that evidence of accused's sexual interest in complainant, and/or young males has significant probative value – whether sufficient grounds for finding such evidence does not have significant probative value – whether exceptional circumstances arise so as to enable excluded matters proscribed by s 97A(5) to be taken into account – complaint evidence – whether evidence 'fresh in the memory' Legislation Cited: COVID-19 Legislation Amendment (Stronger Communities and Health) Bill 2021 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 61E Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 132, 293, 365, 366 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 66, 94, 97, 97A, 101. 137, 293 Cases Cited: Ayturgrul v The Queen (2012) 247 CLR 170 DPP v Farrugia [2017] NSWCCA 197 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338 IMM v The Queen (2016) 90 ALJR 529 Jackmain v R [2020] NSWCCA 150 JWM v R [2020] NSWCCA 248 McPhillamy v The Queen (2018) 92 ALJR 105 R v BD (No.1) [2020] NSWDC 150 R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335 R v Coleman [2020] ACTSC 97 R v Edwards [2015] NSWCCA 24 R v Gregory-Roberts [2016] NSWCCA 92 R v Jamal (2008) 72 NSWLR 258 R v Obeid [2015] NSWSC 897 R v Stanley [2013] NSWCCA 124 R v XY (2010) 79 NSWLR 629 The Queen v Bauer (2018) 92 ALJR 846 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 25 February 2020 Stephen Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law (15th ed, 2020, Thomson Reuters) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) Mr R Brookman (the accused) Representation: Solicitors: Solicitor Advocate for the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) Mr G Walsh (solicitor) for the accused File Number(s): 2020/12398
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate